<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Toronto Computer Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torontocomputerservice.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torontocomputerservice.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canadian Songwriters Want To Charge You More For Internet Access by André Vittorio</title>
		<link>http://torontocomputerservice.ca/canadian-songwriters-want-to-charge-you-more-for-internet-access/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>André Vittorio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontocomputerservice.ca/?p=88#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Thanks Eddie for the clarification around the $10 fee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eddie for the clarification around the $10 fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canadian Songwriters Want To Charge You More For Internet Access by Don Quarles</title>
		<link>http://torontocomputerservice.ca/canadian-songwriters-want-to-charge-you-more-for-internet-access/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Quarles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontocomputerservice.ca/?p=88#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Thanks for drawing attention to the S.A.C.&#039;s business to business model to monetize music file-sharing. Please allow us to clarify a few points.

1. Our current proposal does not support or advocate a levy or tax of any kind, or of any amount, including the  $10.00 amount mentioned.

2. As is clearly stated in our paper on the proposal, available at our website http://www.songwriters.ca/proposalsummary.aspx and http://www.songwriters.ca/proposaldetailed.aspx, musicians, songwriters, performers and all rights-holders including record labels would be compensated from the revenues the proposed business model might generate.

3. Canadians households who do not wish to music file-share would pay nothing. There would be no charges of any kind.

4. Canadians households who would like unlimited music file-sharing would be licensed to do so legally. All Canadians would have the choice to opt in or out.

5. Since independent musicians are now by some counts over 30% of the market place much of the revenue derived would go to encourage new talent and allow struggling music creators to make a living.

The S.A.C. is a small not for profit organization. We will continue to advocate what we believe are reasonable solutions that are fair to consumers, music creators and rights-holders.

Thank you


Eddie Schwartz																Don Quarles
President																	Executive Director
Songwriters Association of Canada 		                                                                                Songwriters Association of Canada</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for drawing attention to the S.A.C.&#8217;s business to business model to monetize music file-sharing. Please allow us to clarify a few points.</p>
<p>1. Our current proposal does not support or advocate a levy or tax of any kind, or of any amount, including the  $10.00 amount mentioned.</p>
<p>2. As is clearly stated in our paper on the proposal, available at our website <a href="http://www.songwriters.ca/proposalsummary.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.songwriters.ca/proposalsummary.aspx</a> and <a href="http://www.songwriters.ca/proposaldetailed.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.songwriters.ca/proposaldetailed.aspx</a>, musicians, songwriters, performers and all rights-holders including record labels would be compensated from the revenues the proposed business model might generate.</p>
<p>3. Canadians households who do not wish to music file-share would pay nothing. There would be no charges of any kind.</p>
<p>4. Canadians households who would like unlimited music file-sharing would be licensed to do so legally. All Canadians would have the choice to opt in or out.</p>
<p>5. Since independent musicians are now by some counts over 30% of the market place much of the revenue derived would go to encourage new talent and allow struggling music creators to make a living.</p>
<p>The S.A.C. is a small not for profit organization. We will continue to advocate what we believe are reasonable solutions that are fair to consumers, music creators and rights-holders.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p>Eddie Schwartz																Don Quarles<br />
President																	Executive Director<br />
Songwriters Association of Canada 		                                                                                Songwriters Association of Canada</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

